Match-ups?

So instead of a stock battle (which I thoroughly enjoyed, not bashing it or anything), why can't we do a match-up type war?

In the beginning, the two leaders choose who will play who. To do this, they will flip a coin, or do something quick and simple to ensure it's random. Then, whoever wins the mini game chooses which match-up they want. Or, the two leaders could agree on who plays who.

For example:

Team A: A, B, C, D

Team B: 1, 2, 3, 4

The leaders would choose like A plays 3, B plays 1, D plays 3, or different combinations.

RULES

The players play the matches, and it goes games won (NOT SERIES). So if Team A accumulated 6 wins to Team B's 5 wins, team A would win the war.

In order to determine home/away, let the timer run out.

If both teams tie, the leaders play each other in a final tiebreaker match/series (whichever).

ADVANTAGES:

*More convenient; people can play whenever as long as it takes less than a week.

*More strategic, in my opinion. For example, do you go with the "guaranteed two game sweep" with your best player on a weaker player, or do you make him play a different good player, risking a loss?

DISADVANTAGES:

* Disagreeing on a match-up could cause some problems.

* You guys could probably think of more...

What do you guys think?



lolfail XD

Faction leaders are currently discussing on what the default rules for wars will be. We are also coming up with a list of banned techniques in war matches. As soon as everything is decided we will make post on it.